In Reply to @crscardellino @crscardellino Epa, felicitaciones :D

In Reply to @tpaschalis_ @tpaschalis_ @zxul767 @bitfield Very interesting insights, and very well written, thank you for that :)

In Reply to @ @zxul767 @bitfield In all fairness, code intended for use in production would likely never do that. Why would you len a fixed size item? At the very least you would likely check for len/nullity of the outer slice.

In Reply to @ralsina @ralsina @marcosalcazar Es buenísimo, dado el contacto que suelo tener con mis vecinos me importaría poco si fuesen snobs del vino o klingons

In Reply to @goinggodotnet @goinggodotnet But the code does not satisfy the “scarcity” that makes art a economically valuable (on top of the artistic value/quality) unless you get the © which is another can of worms. Limited run dated+signed prints perhaps?

In Reply to @perrito666 @zxul767 @bitfield Thinking more about this, it sounds like a bug in that optimization code. It should likely convert that to and index access that panics and then a return 10

In Reply to @ @zxul767 @bitfield I believe it is not, this is likely len()’s doing, since the returned item is an array and therefore of fixed length that is likely a compiler optimization which knows the answer will always be 10 and by the time that hits runtime that has been made a const.

Tengo una idea idílica de una granja que mi 🧠 convenientemente adorna haciéndome olvidar la cantidad de trabajo que lleva todos los dias.

RT @FMilanessi: SORTEO CAJA MAGICA 🤩🤩 Hoy es mi momento de agradecer y vos podés ganarte este MEGA PREMIO. Seguime, hace RT y completa el f…

So, i made a thing very loosely based on one published by @RichRap3D https://t.co/UjWKuAKR1w